Your done. Just send it to my FFL, and I'll take it off your hands before you get into trouble. You can thank me later.

 

A .22 rimfire can have a larger than 10 feed tube, however you can only load 7 at home and 10 at the range.
FUAC

 

What? Here we go again. I thought 22 was exempt (sigh).

 

Someone correct me if I am wrong, but I think it is only exempt from tube capacity.

 

it doesn't have a removeable mag, so shouldn't matter (my opinion).
lever is not semi-auto , so it should be good (I hope)

 

Before everyone gets confused again, in order to be exempt, a magazine must have ALL of the following qualities:

1. .22 Rimfire
2. Tube Fed
3. Attached

If any one of them is missing, the max capacity is 10 and you can only load 7, unless you are at a range, then you can load 10.

This affects all guns. Bolt, lever, semi, .22, etc.

The magazine ban and the AWB are totally separate.

 

Here's a thread describing it again.

http://www.nyfirearms.com/forums/laws-politics/45642-sa-22lr-tube-fed-rifle-ok-not.html

 

Right. So the model 60 is exempt from the BS scosgt posted.

 

Right. So the model 60 is exempt .

Correct.

 

I also asked that question of Shooter and he confirmed exempt from round capacity. Although I think I'll wait awhile till this law gets knocked in the head.

 

You buy that Marlin at Gander? And yes, tube fed are exempt.

 

Tube fed center fires of any action type are still not exempt as feeding device- any feeding device over ten round cap even attached to gun permanently can be considered a high capacity feeding device regardless of the type of gun it is attached to EXCePt 22 rimfire tubes. The 7/10 max still applies. So yes the way the law was written a Winchester 1873 made in 1900 with a fourteen round tube is arestricted mag ! It is not an assault weapon but the magazine is a high cap. No there is no way to makes sense of this because it does not. It would fall into the curio and relic exemption but what about along barrel 44 mag with a cap of 12? Yep restricted high cap feeding device!

 

Bans possession of any "high-capacity magazines" regardless of when they were made or sold. The maximum capacity for all magazines is remains 10 rounds. It is a "Class D Violent Felony" to load more than 7 rounds into a magazine, even at home, for personal and family protection. There is a limited exception, while at a gun range, ten rounds may be loaded into a magazine for target practice or in shooting competitions. Otherwise, simply the loading of an eighth round into a magazine is a more severe crime under the SAFE Act, than criminally negligent homicide, a "Class E Felony" under NYS law. Magazines owned before passage of the SAFE Act able to hold seven to ten rounds can be possessed, but cannot be loaded with more than seven rounds. .22 caliber tubular magazines are exempt from this limit. Previously legal "pre-1994-ban" magazines with a capacity of 30 rounds are not exempt, and must be sold within one year to an out-of-state resident or turned in to local authorities. The magazine limit took effect April 15, 2013.

 

No. Please don't do that.
8 rounds is a misdemeanor (first offense is a violation at home).

Things are bad enough. Don't be like the Dems and make it up.

 

except when the .22 rifle has a thumbhole stock. Now it's an assault weapon. Was in the process of purchasing an Olympic style match rifle for competition. Not anymore because it falls under the SAFE act.

 

You don't start counting evil features unless it is semi-auto AND has a detachable magazine. I can't put a thumbhole stock on my 10/22, but I believe it's fine on my Marlin 60.

 

The fact we are even discussing this is stupid.

 

This.. This... This

 

So this means I can't buy a new production lever gun in 357 because it holds 12???

 

Correct.

 

As long as were on the subject. The m1a/m14 is also no good now because it has the flash hider/brake correct?

i know sorry...thread hijack!

 

Correct.

 

Nope-the law specifically calls out .22 rimfire. .17 hmr isn't .22

 

I believe this is the law...

Magazine capacity
Effective April 15, 2013, only magazines that contain seven rounds of ammunition or less can be sold in New York. Magazines that can hold more than seven rounds but not more than ten rounds and are currently possessed will be grandfathered, but may only be loaded with seven rounds. By January 15, 2014, magazines that have the capacity to hold more than ten rounds of ammunition that were grandfathered by 1994 legislation must be discarded or sold to a licensed dealer or an out-of-state purchaser. Exceptions are made for large capacity magazines that are curios or relics.
Exemptions to allow manufacturers, licensed dealers and police officers to possess large capacity magazines continue to apply, except for an apparent drafting error in the NY SAFE Act that can read to prohibit anyone from possessing a magazine that is loaded with more than seven rounds. The exemption provided by Penal Law §265.20(a)(8) for manufacturers of “large capacity ammunition feeding devices”, etc. was unchanged, so that Section 265.02(8), which makes possession of a “large capacity ammunition feeding device” a class D felony wouldn’t apply to a manufacturer, even though the definition of a “large capacity ammunition feeding devices” has been expanded. This would be the end of the discussion except that the SAFE Act added two new sections banning certain magazines that are not exempted by Section 265.20:
• Penal Law § 265.36: Makes it a class A misdemeanor to knowingly possess a “greater than ten” magazine manufactured before 9/13/1994, if owned before 1/15/2013.
• Penal Law § 265.37: Makes it a class A misdemeanor to knowingly possess an “ammunition feeding device” that was possessed before 1/15/2013 if it has a capacity of “more than seven but less than ten” if loaded with more than seven.

 

Flyriderx7 you are correct a cap over ten center fire lever would now be against the law

 

I bought the Marlin at Jonson's Country store in Lockport,NY.