New York Firearms Forum banner

So What IS an SKS exactly?

9.2K views 25 replies 14 participants last post by  USMC225G  
#1 ·
Although I've unfortunately heard it referred to as an "assault rifle", anyone with any knowledge of firearms whatsoever knows for a fact that the SKS is in fact not an 'assault rifle". I'll give the guy who talked about mag conversions to make the SKS an "assault rifle" on YouTube a pass because his intentions were good...

Regardless, I've been into SKS's for a while now and they are a gorgeous, relatively handy and diverse weapon system. The SKS is certainly a semi-automatic carbine, we know that. However, what I've never considered is what role, or what type of soldier would carry an SKS. Well, we know it's not an assault rifle. That is, a handy gun suited for close to medium range that can lay down quick and relatively heavy fire (compared to something like an LMG, etc). But if you look at something like a DMR, that would be something chambered in a higher powered cartridge, that would basically be a midway point (in my understanding) between individuals with battle rifles, and perhaps assault rifles.

So, what role does the SKS fit exactly? Well, my understanding is that the SKS was meant to be (or at least is) the middle ground between guys using something like a Mosin Nagant, and closer range weapons like assault rifles and SMG's. I've heard that it was designed for stripper clips to be able to still be effective no matter what. It can't lay down the fire that full-auto weapons can, but it is a more effective option than something like a Mosin Nagant for medium range combat. I've also heard that stripper clips were used because suppose a guy with a full auto runs out of ammo, he's screwed and won't ever have time to reload. On the other hand, you may have a slow rate of loading the gun, but you can continuously load with stripper clips even when you're out, which lets you put out continuous fire even when you're "out".

So after my novel here... Is there actually a name or designation for the role of a rifle such as the SKS? It's not an assault rifle, it's not a battle rifle, and it's not really a DMR. I suppose in some ways, it could be adapted to fit these roles, but would never be true to any of them. So... What exactly IS an SKS?
 
#17 ·
I was under the impression that the SKS was never widely fielded in general service. Both it and the AK were designed around the intermediate M43 7.62x39 round that was first put into production near the end of WW2.

The story behind the development of both the SKS and AK are really interesting. Simonov was one of the premier Soviet arms designers, and his SKS design incorporated some features of his earlier PTRS anti tank rifle. In some ways, the basic design of the SKS represented the thinking of experienced arms designers which were used to having highly specialized factories build guns. Although the SKS did not see wide deployment, another gun designed around the same time using an intermediate round, a short stroke gas system and a tilting bolt did last a bit longer - the FAL of Saive.

Kalashnikov was a tank mechanic and crew member, and although he had less formal training in arms design he had a keen mind for design. His AK platform required much less complex machining than the SKS, using a receiver that is riveted together rather than being milled out of a steel forging. The long stroke piston on the AK means fewer parts to lose in the field, and the open design of the receiver makes the FCG group almost as easy to clean as the SKS.
 
#7 ·
I'm planning on doing a few SKS videos. I mean, I love my Yugo M59 (non-66) to death. Mismatched all over, but it is a beauty and I've only had 1 malfunction in 300 rounds. But with old bare steel S&B ammo that got rusty.

Shoots Tula, Wolf and everything else I feed it like a champ.

I kind of want to do a 1000 round torture test over a few months with only an initial cleaning and a firing pin cleaning every 300+ rounds and see how far it can go with steel cased... But I also don't want to ruin a good rifle. Maybe I should find a Chinese Type 56 beater to mess around with.
 
#10 ·
#12 ·
SKS can be NY compliant or not. Many came with a fixed magazine in which case they are compliant. Back in the mid to late 80s you could pick one up for under $100. There were some that shipped with a removable magazine. Those would not be compliant. The exception is if you C & R for collecting antique firearms AND the SKS in question was old enough to qualify as an antique.
 
#24 ·
SKS's are NOT antiques, many are Curios and Relics. There is a difference. One does NOT need an FFL to collect an antique firearm. However you need at least a C&R to get an SKS that date qualifies mailed to your door. The rifle has to be 50 years old to the date of purchase, but ALSO fit the criterion as listed in the ATF C&R Manual. SKSs made in the 70s are not C&Rs. To be an antique the receiver has to have been made pre-1899, 1898 and earlier. Case in point, The Mosin Nagants. Many folks seek out the Finn reworked Mosins, because many were built on pre 1898 receivers in Russia only to be captured or given to Finland, in which they reworked them all in the 1940s, 50s and 60s. So all you need is a valid drivers license for a very good, basic, cheap, hunting rifle. The Antiques I buy, DO NOT get entered into my FFL03 log book, because they are NOT C&Rs, nor did I use my FFL to purchase them.

Now, to answer the original question of what is an SKS...well, its a Carbine, some will call it an Intermediate Battle Rifle, but really, its just a semi-auto rifle that fires and intermediate rifle cartridge. Its a carbine, because its short, fires an intermediate round, only 10 rounds, and was used by "special troops", support personnel, etc etc. Its service life was so short lived within the Army as a main rifle, where SMGs ruled the roust until the AK came out.

The SKS is a carbine.
 
#14 ·
Not sure about the Chinese ones where I believe they get the reputation of being a POS rifle. But as far as the Yugo 59/66 they are very well made durable rifles. You could use the term weapon system with these. Gas block shut off, integral bayonet, launcher spigot and sight ladder, flip up night sights(A1) one of the cool features is the quick magazine dump. Hard beech wood stocks. Parts and ammo are readily available and they always go bang. Even at the prices now, if you get a matching unissued one it's all good. And also legal. So my answer to the OP's question; What exactly is the SKS? Around here it's the fully functional Simonov vs. the pathetically neutered wall hanger Kalashnikov that your allowed to have.
 
#20 · (Edited)
An SKS is a badassed FUAC approved fixed magazine 7.62x39 rifle with a 10 rd capacity that has the reliability to go bang each and every time. It is designed to be fired with steel cased ammunition. I never had a malfunction when I had mine. I had 2 inch groups at 100 yards using crap Tula ammo. It is capable of going further than 300, but 300 yards is the max you can be reliably accurate with on man sized targets. It is loaded quickly using stripper clips just as fast as a regular mag change. The tolerances are loose and can take a beating and still fire without ever cleaning it. The only maintenance you need is making sure the firing pin moves freely to prevent slam fires. A few drops of oil in the firing pin channel is all that is needed. It is easily convertible to take detachable magazines and there are tons of aftermarket parts for it to turn it into a more modern configuration. I once had it in a bullpup configuration.

To this day you see them still being used in Afghanistan. It is a peasants rifle that can take a beating. Besides the stock, all moving parts are big and made of tough metal unlike an AR with small parts that have to be babied to keep functioning. A shoestring with knots and used motor oil keeps them running over there.

So I would guess the role it plays is a great SHTF/ Deer rifle that you do not have to care for much when cleaning supplies run out. And when the ammo runs dry, you have a spear with the big bayonet that folds underneath the barrel. The bayonet can also be used as a makeshift monopod. I

This guy in the video below has it in an inexpensive Tapco polymer stock that would handle adverse weather conditions better than wood does. Even better, it is NY legal with any evil feature you want due to it having a fixed magazine.


 
#23 ·
To answer the original question, the SKS is not what would normally be called an Assault Rifle, because it is not select fire.

In its usual form, it is also not an Assault Weapon, since it has a fixed magazine with a 10-round capacity (note: it is an AW in Rochester in that form and probably NYC, but I'm not sure about the latter.) You can even switch to a pistol grip and adjustable stock (as in the video above) without a problem. Once you are used to them, stripped clips are pretty quick. With a detachable magazine conversion, you generally only have to worry about removing the bayonet (and, of course, using 10-rounders), since they have fixed stocks, no pistol grips and usually no muzzle devices (or threads to accept one.) Of course, then you can't switch to a pistol grip or adjustable stock.
 
#26 ·
Thanks for the kind words Frankie.

To add more information about the SKS. The Soviets toyed with the battle rifle idea way back in the 20s and eventually after a few trials and many years, they came up with the AVS-36 then the SVTs. They wanted to add sustained firepower to the line infantry which supported their idea of deep battle doctrine which essentially is slam head long into your enemies front, find the weak point, exploit it, feint along it, break it and Flood in everyone else, including the reserves. How these rifles helped that doctrine is that they were constantly moving forward and volume of fire needs are met. Throw in a few thousand high ROF SMGs and powerful MGs with massive artillery, and you nearly have most adversaries outgunned. Now...with that said, the SKS came about when they developed the 7.62x39 for the RPD which replaced the DP-28s. They realized how effective the 7.92 kurz for the STG was and they wanted a powerful .30 cal round that performed better than the 54r, since they wouldn't have to re-die much of their machines and they had tons of .311 bullet laying about. The SKS was really a day late and a dollar short since it was to replace the SVTs and 91/30s. It was simple to use and easy to maintain, without sacrificing firepower. The intent was to issue it to all their infantryman, much like the 91/30s. It was made to fight the Germans, but took until after the war to get it produced and it wasn't until the 7.62x39 was developed and issued that this rifle arrived for use, sometime around 1949. This would mean that the reports of the first SKS types that were supposedly tested in WW2 in combat are that of the 54r flavor. Which I think there is one in the Museum in Moscow.

Its just that the AK was designed at the same time as the SKS and the AK exceeded the needs of the Red Army for the obvious reasons. The SKS became a support troops rifle and was also the Main Rifle for many Warsaw pact armies until they got the AK at which point, the SKS fell back into a support roll.