Right, because only blacks and latinos do drugs. Obviously you've never been to Oswego county.He was just setting up the black / latino vote.
He did say a percentage ... I wanna say it was around 82% of all drug related arrests were blacks and hispanics .... then he went into ..... we're sorry and I'm going to kiss your azz and we're sorry that you made a bad choice and that arrest would affect you in getting a job, so we'll stop arresting the blacks and hispanics!! .... that is not only offending to me, but if he's going to stop arresting a certain group of people for having drugs then he can STOP ATTACKING THE GROUP OF PEOPLE THAT WANT TO KEEP THEIR 2A RIGHTS!!!!! STOP THIS CRAP AND SAY YOU'RE SORRY TO ME CUOMO FOR MAKING ME AND OTHERS FEEL LIKE FBOMBING CRIMINALS YOU M'FER!!!!!Right, because only blacks and latinos do drugs. Obviously you've never been to Oswego county.
He said it, not me. YOU obviously didn't watch the speech. Obviously more than blacks and latinos smoke pot but he of course had to focus on that group right after he talked about "discrimination". Kind of funny he basically discriminates himself immediately after and says that the majority of people who do drugs are black and latino.Right, because only blacks and latinos do drugs. Obviously you've never been to Oswego county.
I agree with you, but the answer to the question you pose is this. When people get addicted to hard drugs (marijuana's addictiveness is unproven at best for the vast majority of people), they become really, really desperate. Really, really desperate people do really, really desperate things. When you combine that with the effects of the drug, you end up with these stories of dudes taking 33 9mm rounds and still killing cops.I don't do drugs. I won't ever do drugs. That's irrelevant to what the law should be. If somebody wants to stay at home at do drugs all day long, what the hell do I care? As soon as they get into a car or any other situation where it puts others at risk, THAT'S where we have a problem and THAT'S what should be illegal, not the sale or possession of substances or items.
He was simply stating facts. Drug laws do affect people of color more than whites even though there's no evidence that they do them more.He said it, not me. YOU obviously didn't watch the speech. Obviously more than blacks and latinos smoke pot but he of course had to focus on that group right after he talked about "discrimination". Kind of funny he basically discriminates himself immediately after and says that the majority of people who do drugs are black and latino.
Like I said, the acts they commit while on drugs are what should be illegal. Simply posessing and taking them shouldn't be illegal. Yes, some go out and do desparate things, but should those who don't be punished for those who do? If you answer is yes, then I would ask you to replace drugs with guns and see if your answer stays the same.I agree with you, but the answer to the question you pose is this. When people get addicted to hard drugs (marijuana's addictiveness is unproven at best for the vast majority of people), they become really, really desperate. Really, really desperate people do really, really desperate things. When you combine that with the effects of the drug, you end up with these stories of dudes taking 33 9mm rounds and still killing cops.
I am all for the absolute minimal number of laws, and maximum personal choice and responsibility. But I'm not sure I could get behind legalizing drugs like heroin, PCP, etc.
The difference is guns don't cause people to become violent and commit crimes (even though half the world is going insane and thinks they do). Drugs do CAUSE that. Anything that removes free will and causes crimes to be committed is something that I am ok banning.He was simply stating facts. Drug laws do affect people of color more than whites even though there's no evidence that they do them more.
Like I said, the acts they commit while on drugs are what should be illegal. Simply posessing and taking them shouldn't be illegal. Yes, some go out and do desparate things, but should those who don't be punished for those who do? If you answer is yes, then I would ask you to replace drugs with guns and see if your answer stays the same.
Yeah? In that case, will you please change your avatar and your handle? Scotch removes free will and causes crimes to be comitted. Should be banned, right?The difference is guns don't cause people to become violent and commit crimes (even though half the world is going insane and thinks they do). Drugs do CAUSE that. Anything that removes free will and causes crimes to be committed is something that I am ok banning.
D'oh!Yeah? In that case, will you please change your avatar and your handle? Scotch removes free will and causes crimes to be comitted. Should be banned, right?