New York Firearms Forum banner
1 - 20 of 87 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
439 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Chinese media slams Romney as convention begins | The Cable

The Chinese state-owned outlet said that Romney was "provoking" China bypromising to supply Taiwan with aircraft and other military platforms andcalled his China approach "pugnacious."

**The facts these commies hate Romney makes me like him a little more.**

***BTW: I highly doubt the Chinese said "pugnacious".***
 

· Registered
Joined
·
290 Posts
In fairness, I know a lot of freedom-loving gun owners that hate Romney..
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,776 Posts
They realize if Romney gets elected the gravy train is over! The Islamic anti-American president is their puppet. We have a choice this year restore of constitution or fall deeper into socalism. (look up the definition in Websters) You make the call. BTW guns are part of the socalist adgend and WILL be under attack.
 

· Postmaster General
Joined
·
23,190 Posts
They realize if Romney gets elected the gravy train is over! The Islamic anti-American president is their puppet. We have a choice this year restore of constitution or fall deeper into socalism. (look up the definition in Websters) You make the call. BTW guns are part of the socalist adgend and WILL be under attack.
Romney not only had his own version of the AWB in Mass., but also has and an Obamacare-esque plan. Yep, no socialism there.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
290 Posts
Do you think OB is going to protect our gun rights? Just check out the UN's position and OB'sstance on gun rights!
This is not about Obama. This is about a lot of misguided gun owners wanting to get Romney in the White House under the delusion that he or the people running the GOP give a damn about our rights. If you want to preserve your rights, vote Libertarian and stock up on ammo.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,776 Posts
Romney not only had his own version of the AWB in Mass., but also has and an Obamacare-esque plan. Yep, no socialism there.
Remember Romnety governed a state with 87% democrats. As far as his STATEWIDE health care. It is a STATES right to decide. That's why each state set its own gun control and everything else that has to do with there states. If you think we are on the right path with OB, all you have to do is look how they are make sucess in this country a bad thing. I don't know about you, but I never once told my kids to strive to get on the welfare handouts. NO i have taught my kids to do the best you can WORK hard and good things will come to you. Mitt might not be the best canidate but if you want more of what we have, have at it.
 

· Postmaster General
Joined
·
23,190 Posts
Remember Romnety governed a state with 87% democrats. As far as his STATEWIDE health care. It is a STATES right to decide. That's why each state set its own gun control and everything else that has to do with there states. If you think we are on the right path with OB, all you have to do is look how they are make sucess in this country a bad thing. I don't know about you, but I never once told my kids to strive to get on the welfare handouts. NO i have taught my kids to do the best you can WORK hard and good things will come to you. Mitt might not be the best canidate but if you want more of what we have, have at it.
Yep, state's right to decide. And in the state he ran, he came up with a socialized medicine plan. He sh*t all over gun owners, and all around kept it on the terrible path like our own state. Nobody forced him in to that position. Did anyone say anything about BO? I didn't. They are equally terrible. I mention all of this and they you say " I don't know about you, but I never once told my kids to strive to get on the welfare handouts."
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,955 Posts
It doesn't matter which of the two clowns are in office after November, neither are capable of "turning the Country around". Presidents are mascots/puppets who line their pockets with lobbyist dollars the same as the rest of the scumbag politicians in the House and Senate. A high percentage of those elected to the House/Senate are lawyers who pass obscure, freedom-flushing laws to keep themselves in business. The more obscure and complex the laws, the better it is for the law business.

I'm particularly concerned with Romney due to his history of flip-flopping on just about every issue and the fact that he is more wealthy than the last 8 Presidents COMBINED. If you think the dept. store mannequin with the plastic million dollar hair-do cares for anything other than huge tax breaks for the wealthiest 1% while the middle class crumbles, pull your head out of the sand. Romney is no more "pro-2A" than Obummer; what I despise is that he acts as if he is in order to appeal to the "base". The sad truth is that the "base" is likely to ultimately reject Romney at the booths because he's a Mormon. Romney does not represent the Republican party, he represents what's wrong with this Country - his "business" venture never produced anything...Bain capital rolled it in betting on companies to fail and shipping jobs overseas, and Romney laughed his way to his bank on the Cayman Islands. I think Ron Paul is bound to receive a lot of conservative and libertarian votes whether he throws himself into the independent slot last minute or not.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,776 Posts
Yep, state's right to decide. And in the state he ran, he came up with a socialized medicine plan. He sh*t all over gun owners, and all around kept it on the terrible path like our own state. Nobody forced him in to that position. Did anyone say anything about BO? I didn't. They are equally terrible. I mention all of this and they you say " I don't know about you, but I never once told my kids to strive to get on the welfare handouts."
I didn't say that you did, but this election is about WAY more that guns. OB has run us into huge debt, highest proploned unemployment beholding to China, killing small business. He has fear and devided our country because that's all he has. His policies have failed and the only way to get reelected is to pan to our fears. Like I said I think there was better otions like Christie, where he wasn't afraid to take on big unions turn a state deficit into a surplus and cutting tax. OB wants bigger govenment, higher taxes and bigger unions. It's not about guns, but our country. Look up Arture Davis, the Co Campain manager of OB in 2008 and democratic Congressman who says all OB is smoke and mirrors, can run on what he has done, only fear and division. Atleast with Mitt he has had a real job, it's time for OB leave and say he failed at his FIRST JOB, many people have, they just didn't make there first real job the President of the US.
 

· Postmaster General
Joined
·
23,190 Posts
I didn't say that you did, but this election is about WAY more that guns. OB has run us into huge debt, highest proploned unemployment beholding to China, killing small business. He has fear and devided our country because that's all he has. His policies have failed and the only way to get reelected is to pan to our fears. Like I said I think there was better otions like Christie, where he wasn't afraid to take on big unions turn a state deficit into a surplus and cutting tax. OB wants bigger govenment, higher taxes and bigger unions. It's not about guns, but our country. Look up Arture Davis, the Co Campain manager of OB in 2008 and democratic Congressman who says all OB is smoke and mirrors, can run on what he has done, only fear and division. Atleast with Mitt he has had a real job, it's time for OB leave and say he failed at his FIRST JOB, many people have, they just didn't make there first real job the President of the US.
That fact that it isn't just about guns is even more reason not to vote for either.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,776 Posts
It doesn't matter which of the two clowns are in office after November, neither are capable of "turning the Country around". Presidents are mascots/puppets who line their pockets with lobbyist dollars the same as the rest of the scumbag politicians in the House and Senate. A high percentage of those elected to the House/Senate are lawyers who pass obscure, freedom-flushing laws to keep themselves in business. The more obscure and complex the laws, the better it is for the law business.

I'm particularly concerned with Romney due to his history of flip-flopping on just about every issue and the fact that he is more wealthy than the last 8 Presidents COMBINED. If you think the dept. store mannequin with the plastic million dollar hair-do cares for anything other than huge tax breaks for the wealthiest 1% while the middle class crumbles, pull your head out of the sand. Romney is no more "pro-2A" than Obummer; what I despise is that he acts as if he is in order to appeal to the "base". The sad truth is that the "base" is likely to ultimately reject Romney at the booths because he's a Mormon. I think Ron Paul is bound to receive a lot of votes whether he throws himself into the independent slot last minute or not.
So again were saying becoming wealthy is a bad thing. His dad was a high school graduate that started his own business from nothing worked HARD and lived the American dream, one many legal immigrants come to this country to achive. As far as flip flopping yes they all do it. I guess OB doesn't flip flop he just does what the unions and special interst groups tell him to do, hell he hasn't even gotten a budget passed not one. He has also created the biggest debt in the history of the world. He promised a change 4 years ago, we go it and I'll take my chances with Mitt. If I don't like what he has done in 4 years I' will vote him out!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,955 Posts
...

Atleast with Mitt he has had a real job

...
Can't agree here. Mitt hasn't worked for many, many years. He inherited a pile of wealth and went into a venture capital firm with a bunch of Harvard buddies of his and bet on companies to fail while off-shoring jobs like it was going out of style, all while paying a tax rate of roughly 15%. That's less than half what I have paid every year for as long as I have worked (since I was 15/16). There's a reason he won't release his tax returns beyond 2 years...it would nauseate the educated public.

I'm not fan of Obummer either, but let's not throw anyone on pedestals solely based on the party they are running under. Both candidates suck...politicians are a byproduct of garbage in, garbage out.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,776 Posts
Can't agree here. Mitt hasn't worked for 5+ years. He inherited a pile of wealth and went into a venture capital firm with a bunch of Harvard buddies of his and bet on companies to fail while off-shoring jobs like it was going out of style, all while paying a tax rate of roughly 15%. That's less than half what I have paid every year for as long as I have worked (since I was 15/16). There's a reason he won't release his tax returns beyond 2 years...it would nauseate the educated public.
Again your saying because his dad a high school graduate worked hard and achieved sucess we should not like Romney. Remember JFK's dad made all his money bootlegging nobody disliked JFK for it. However this administration has fed on class warfare and making being sucessful a bad thing. God forbid we try to make money in this country. Pelosi, Reid Clinton and yes OB are pretty well off and they also shelter their money. BTW Romney's 15% is more than a lot of us on this borad put together don't pay. Let's also remember he give Millions in charity, OB has give $300according toown his tax return.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,147 Posts
Can't agree here. Mitt hasn't worked for many, many years. He inherited a pile of wealth and went into a venture capital firm with a bunch of Harvard buddies of his and bet on companies to fail while off-shoring jobs like it was going out of style, all while paying a tax rate of roughly 15%. That's less than half what I have paid every year for as long as I have worked (since I was 15/16). There's a reason he won't release his tax returns beyond 2 years...it would nauseate the educated public.

I'm not fan of Obummer either, but let's not throw anyone on pedestals solely based on the party they are running under. Both candidates suck...politicians are a byproduct of garbage in, garbage out.
Someone's been watching too much MSNBC.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
290 Posts
Voting for the third party just gets OB reelected. No there is no choice here, and OB isn't the choice.
People keep on saying that and it keeps on propping up the same 2 parties that have shown they don't actually care about us.

Again your saying because his dad a was high school graduate, worked hard, and achieved success we should not like Romney. Remember JFK's dad made all his money bootlegging nobody disliked JFK for it. However this administration has fed on class warfare and making being successful a bad thing. God forbid we try to make money in this country. Pelosi, Reid Clinton and yes OB are pretty well off and they also shelter their money. BTW Romney's 15% is more than a lot of us on this board put together don't pay. Let's also remember he gave Millions in charity, OB has give $300 according to his own his tax return.
So he's just like the Dems is what you're saying?
 

· Postmaster General
Joined
·
23,190 Posts
What if I told you that a vote for Obama, Romney, or a 3rd party candidate all yielded the same result in NY?


I'll vote for the one that will make my conscience feel good, because that is all that matters in this state.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
839 Posts
A vote for anyone but Romney is as good as a vote for obummer even though Romney might not be the best option he's the better of 2 evils, unfortunately in this state it does not matter anyway's. You have to remember he was not the governor of a state like Arizona or Virginia but of Mass. where 2/3rds of both chambers were controlled by antigun democrats who blocked everything they did not like. Jim Wallace whose Executive director of the Mass Gun Owners Action League and NRA Committee member even says "during the Romney administration no anti sportsman or anti second amendment legislation made it to the governors desk and the governor even managed to sign 5 pro second amendment/pro sportsman bills into law." So maybe more people should read into the small print of the bills and not look at the misleading title. I'm not saying Romney is a savoir of the second amendment by any means but he does not seem to be as bad as everyone seems to say and is miles better then Barack..

For anyone who has questions about Romneys record on guns and the legislation he passed as gov of Mass check this link out The Romney Record, Mitt Romney's Record as Governor of MA
 

· Postmaster General
Joined
·
23,190 Posts
"Deadly assault weapons have no place in Massachusetts. These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense. They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people."

Who exactly forced him to say those words?

That's like some people disagreeing with welfare (which I DO!) and having Obama say:

"You fat welfare queens need to get off your lazy asses and get a job. Stop using your gubment cheese to pay your dealer and the check from your baby daddy to pay your pimp."

Completely stabbing in the back the people that support you the best!
 
1 - 20 of 87 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top