New York Firearms Forum banner
1 - 20 of 44 Posts

· Banned
Joined
·
7,787 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
He maybe being set up to be nominated to the Supreme Court..........BOOM!!!!

I wonder what he knows, that no one else knows. Is Ginsberg getting ready to resign?

Remember Harry Reid changed the rules of the Senate so the Republicans couldn't stop it either. What then people? What do we do then if this happens?
This was a discussion topic on "The Five" today. It was brought up by Dana Perino, Bush's former press secretary. Bob Beckle also indicated this possibility on the show. I'll tell you what. If Obama want's a Communist long term legacy, putting Eric Holder on the Supreme Court would do it. That possibility should scare the crap out of all of us. Can you say "Good-bye 2nd Amendment" for starters?"​
this could be big trouble
 

· Registered
Joined
·
735 Posts
Ginsburg was interviewed recently and said NO WAY..... ..because she believes no other progressive liberal [communist] like her could be confirmed in this political climate. this was reported by MSNBC. ...and the liberals are not happy with this statement by the ol witch.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,209 Posts
My take on her decision not to retire is that even she recognizes what an evil, criminal, violationist POS Holder is, and that creating the vacancy that could put him on the SCOTUS and all of the damage he would would cause to our great nation would be her legacy...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
14,520 Posts
ugg... that would be bad freaking news if he got that spot.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,406 Posts
He maybe being set up to be nominated to the Supreme Court..........BOOM!!!!
Senate business for 2014 is OVER, between now and January they're effectively on vacation.

With the Fall elections around the corner, NOTHING gets done until the new Senate term in 2015.

If Ginsberg dropped dead tomorrow, we wouldn't have a replacement until next term.

Confirmation process takes time, and Pubs are going to have at least 50 votes in the Senate next term.

Even the RINOs realize how toxic Holder's been as AG, SCOTUS isn't going to happen.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,836 Posts
The nuclear option DOES NOT apply to SCOTUS, only to the lower courts. 60 votes are still needed to confirm a new Supreme Court Justice. Even if the Senate makeup remained identical to it's current state after November, they D's couldn't place Holder on SCOTUS with a simple majority vote.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,216 Posts
Bring it, let him get on. This will just speed things up to us taking back our country. Burn it down start over.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,101 Posts
The nuclear option DOES NOT apply to SCOTUS, only to the lower courts. 60 votes are still needed to confirm a new Supreme Court Justice. Even if the Senate makeup remained identical to it's current state after November, they D's couldn't place Holder on SCOTUS with a simple majority vote.
That was my understanding as well. Reid's rule change is a concern because the Democrats could stack the DC Circuit court of appeals, not the SCOTUS.

The rule change does not apply to Supreme Court nominations or to legislation.
Reid, Democrats trigger 'nuclear' option; eliminate most filibusters on nominees - The Washington Post
 

· Registered
Joined
·
585 Posts
I am hoping that justice reaches that hyena in the form of a bus placing itself on top of him in the near term. Ginsburg will die on the court. Good riddance to that rat.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,568 Posts
Holder is resigning because he faces contempt charges next month. If he retires, he takes his secrets with him.
Agree, what's a better way to keep all the dirty little secrets under wraps while simultaneously starting fresh with another new "progressive" AG that has a few years to do damage before their wretched anti American legacy leaks out and he/she resigns. At which point the process starts all over again...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,209 Posts
I thought this was good also.
I am just realizing some thing has to be up , there has to be another spot they want him in,

Beside the supreme court where would it be ,
Hillary's VP? He is a champion of minority and womens rights after all, is he not?
 
1 - 20 of 44 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top