Joined
·
1,009 Posts
Maybe a special tax on the bullets?We can be certain that more gun laws would have stopped the criminal from engaging in criminal activity.
See, this is how MISIMFORMED you really are DystruktoBoi, if we made it against the law to defy a restraining order by the court and made it illegal for him to have firearms after a judge declared by law he could not have them, none of this would have happened. Oh wait.........LOL!Is this the same story?
Shooting at spa in Wisconsin: 4 dead, including gunman, police say | The Lookout - Yahoo! News
Also I love this part in the above article:
Online court records showed that Haughton "was not allowed to have firearms and was directed to deliver firearms to the sheriff," the Journal Sentinel said. "The order does not indicate if that happened."
NO.....****ING.....WAY!!!!!
You mean this guy DIDN'T follow the law? BUT THIS NEVER HAPPENS!
Bill - will you un-ban Courier just long enough for him to see this and then boot him again? XD
See, this is how MISIMFORMED you really are DystruktoBoi, if we made it against the law to defy a restraining order by the court and made it illegal for him to have firearms after a judge declared by law he could not have them, none of this would have happened. Oh wait.........LOL!
I'm DYING to find out what firearm(s) he used! NOT LIKE IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE but cannot wait how our media will spin this. Assault weapon will be used, we already know that is a guarantee!!
James
Me said:Done with a handgun.
Yeah just like the protection order kept him away from herWe can be certain that more gun laws would have stopped the criminal from engaging in criminal activity.
It was probably a "glock"So yes, in the eyes of the media, it was an assault weapon. [/COLOR]
Is there another type of handgun?It was probably a "glock"