Joined
·
2,327 Posts
Heres a link to the copy of the small arms treaty draft from National Ass For Gun Rights:
http://nagr.org/UN_Draft_Treaty.pdf
http://nagr.org/UN_Draft_Treaty.pdf
Dudy Brown..Who's notes in blue ink and yellow highlighter are those?
Is that a real name?Dudy Brown..
It did say "end users".The way I read it is this is for exporting small arms. Registering who they are sold to meaning the importers, not individual buyers.
The US Marines or a police agency could be "end users".It did say "end users".![]()
Dudley Brown - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaIs that a real name?
It's intended to be vague. The one part you need to look at is that amendments can be added at anytime, and will not need to be ratified through Congress...and there can be unlimited amendments..The US Marines or a police agency could be "end users".
Or it could mean people too. It's too vague.
Ah, far removed from DUDY Brown. xD
Don't bother. I posted a link to several cases that ruled that the constitution supersedes any international treaties and nobody on this site cared to believe it.SCOTUS case Reid v. Covert for info on what would happen if the UN small arms treaty was signed by the US.
Actually, I did agree with you on it..however, I don't think it's going to stop them from trying to supercede it...most of the sheeple don't even know what the Constitution is..Don't bother. I posted a link to several cases that ruled that the constitution supersedes any international treaties and nobody on this site cared to believe it.
All they have to do is get the SCOTUS to change it's stance on the 2nd Amendment, if Obama appoints one or 2 judges, it'll be all over..SCOTUS case Reid v. Covert for info on what would happen if the UN small arms treaty was signed by the US.
There will not be another case before the supreme court on the level of those recently decided for quite some time.All they have to do is get the SCOTUS to change it's stance on the 2nd Amendment, if Obama appoints one or 2 judges, it'll be all over..