If they applied for a CCW and have the training then he has a CCW. There is no need to show cause anymore as you indicated in your post.I know someone who recently got a permit. They said that the judge told them that it was essentially restricted to hunting and target practice. Did not the Bruen decision eliminate this practice?
Summary: the license types in NY are as follows:2. Types of licenses. A license for gunsmith or dealer in firearms
shall be issued to engage in such business. A license for a
semiautomatic rifle, other than an assault weapon or disguised gun,
shall be issued to purchase or take possession of such a semiautomatic
rifle when such transfer of ownership occurs on or after the effective
date of chapter two hundred twelve of the laws of two thousand
twenty-two that amended this subdivision. A license for a pistol or
revolver, other than an assault weapon or a disguised gun, shall be
issued to (a) have and possess in his dwelling by a householder; (b)
have and possess in his place of business by a merchant or storekeeper;
(c) have and carry concealed while so employed by a messenger employed
by a banking institution or express company; (d) have and carry
concealed by a justice of the supreme court in the first or second
judicial departments, or by a judge of the New York city civil court or
the New York city criminal court; (e) have and carry concealed while so
employed by a regular employee of an institution of the state, or of any
county, city, town or village, under control of a commissioner of
correction of the city or any warden, superintendent or head keeper of
any state prison, penitentiary, workhouse, county jail or other
institution for the detention of persons convicted or accused of crime
or held as witnesses in criminal cases, provided that application is
made therefor by such commissioner, warden, superintendent or head
keeper; (f) have and carry concealed, without regard to employment or
place of possession subject to the restrictions of state and federal
law, by any person; and (g) have, possess, collect and carry antique
pistols which are defined as follows: (i) any single shot, muzzle
loading pistol with a matchlock, flintlock, percussion cap, or similar
type of ignition system manufactured in or before 1898, which is not
designed for using rimfire or conventional centerfire fixed ammunition;
and (ii) any replica of any pistol described in clause (i) hereof if
People lie all the the time Judges are nothing specialIf they applied for a CCW and have the training then he has a CCW. There is no need to show cause anymore as you indicated in your post.
Your language is a bit elusive and says the judge explained to his it’s essentially a target and hunting? Essentially doesn’t really say one way or the other and there’s nothing definitive there. Well what does the permit and paperwork say? They maybe saying this because the CCIA has so many restrictions on where you can carry now or they may have said this in an attempt to sway him from carrying. He also may have not met the new requirements for a CCW under the CCIA law. Every county is different and I’m not from that neck of the woods so I can’t say for sure.
My wife will apply for a target and hunting or a premise permit because she not interested in carrying but wants to have mine for my kids if I die and go plinking with me here and there. The 16+2 hour training is too much time and money for her to be worth getting her CCW. Hope this helps.
Yes because what is going on is clearly in violation of the ruling.Hopefully this gets ruled on quickly.FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 21, 2022 Washington, D.C. – Today, Gun Owners of America (GOA) and Gun Owners Foundation (GOF) filed an emergency application with the U.S. Supreme Court to halt the Second Circuit Court’s stay of a preliminary injunction in Antonyuk v. Nigrelli. The case...www.gunowners.org
I can tell you what that information will be and it will not be what we’re hoping for. I hope I’m wrong but nothing good has happened yet. Yes we “won” some lawsuits but there’s wins have turned into nothing except carrying a gun at a church.January 3rd the State will respond to the court to dismiss the GOA emergency application on the Second Circuit stay on the injunction.
This is next week, I believe all the 2A Forums will have the latest information.
From what it looks like, other states will start passing similar carry bans. Might take a few years for SCOTUS to finally hear it.I can tell you what that information will be and it will not be what we’re hoping for. I hope I’m wrong but nothing good has happened yet. Yes we “won” some lawsuits but there’s wins have turned into nothing except carrying a gun at a church.
I think plenty are on the way to passing this. Should help us in the end so I welcome it.From what it looks like, other states will start passing similar carry bans. Might take a few years for SCOTUS to finally hear it.
Their was one case dismissed regarding the AWB in NY. Their is a case out Maryland that is thought to be clearing a path for other states. The SCOTUS will eventually need to hear it as the lower courts are not following the Bruen ruling.I think plenty are on the way to passing this. Should help us in the end so I welcome it.
NYS was just hit with an assault weapons ban lawsuit as well. I can’t wait for that one to go our way.