La. Supreme Court upholds two statutes in gun law challenge | Home | The Advocate - Baton Rouge, LA This is good. Sketny did f*** up.

Obama "Nothing less than the boundaries of executive power are at stake Monday, as the Supreme Court considers whether President Obama violated the Constitution during his first term. Oral arguments slated for Monday will center on a trio of recess appointments to the National Labor Relations...

California Supreme Court Grants Law License… to Illegal Immigrant | TheBlaze.com "The California Supreme Court granted a law license on Thursday to an illegal immigrant who graduated from law school and passed the state bar exam. California Supreme Court Grants Law License to Illegal...

Cayuga county DA just said on radio that the state is not bound to Skretneys 7 round decision because it is a state law not a Federal Law. Lower Federal court rulings are not binding to the state regarding state laws.

Supreme Court Rejects First NSA Surveillance Challenge : Personal Liberty "The U.S. Supreme Court Monday refused to review a challenge to the National Security Agency's collection of domestic telephone records." Lovely.

Wow, here's a weird case, started yesterday...and very relevant to all of us. A Pennsylvania woman, Carol Anne Bond, was tried and convicted by the Feds under an INTERNATIONAL treaty: The Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and...

NYSRPA endorses Paul Wojtaszek for State Supreme Court

U.S. Supreme Court Will Decide Firearms 'Straw Purchaser' Case « Daily Bulletin "The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to adjudicate a case involving a firearms purchase and subsequent resale to a family member. The case of Abramski v. United States, arises from the prosecution of Bruce James...

Constitution Check: Is the Supreme Court only willing to work at the fringes of the Second Amendment? "The message that the Supreme Court has seemed to be sending-at least up until now-is that it is in no hurry to resolve open questions about how far constitutional gun rights extend. It has...

WASHINGTON -- WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court will decide whether a Virginia man should have been convicted of being a "straw purchaser" after buying a gun in-state and selling it to his uncle in Pennsylvania. The high court on Tuesday agreed to hear an appeal from Bruce James Abramski...

US Supreme Court today denied cert on the Maryland state handgun law regarding proving need to have a carry permit. WASHINGTON -- WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court will decide whether a Virginia man should have been convicted of being a "straw purchaser" after buying a gun in-state and...

<a data-cke-saved-href="http://youtu.be/as7z95vtIQU" href="http://youtu.be/as7z95vtIQU">

Ok people - I'm pleased to read about some 2n Amendment wins this week Colorado's poll re-calls - yes Illinois Supreme Court ruling - yes With these pro-gun wins I'm hopping maybe the US district courts will rule against NY Safe act. It has been established : - the right to bear arms is an...

BREAKING: Illinois Supreme Court Rules Right to Keep and Bear Arms Extends Outside the Home | The Truth About Guns It's been a bad, bad week for the gun grabbing twats.

Just viewed NYSRPA site for an update on their challenge to NY safe act. Both parties are to appear in court on Sept 12 At what stage is the challenge at? NYS court NYS Supreme court US or NYS Appellate court (after that goes US Appeals then US Supreme Court) I would hope that once this case...

I just got this in my e-mail so I hope it is not a double post..

I was just reading an article on Heller vs D.C. And noted: - NRA didn't initially support the case, only later - It took five (5) years for the case to go before US Supreme Court I believe it took even longer for McDonald vs Chicago to be heard. The first stages of any challenge to NY's Safe...

I think this is about 6 or 7 years; right? Anyway, the recent Arizona case on voter registration laws that required proof of US citizenship took 6 years to, unfortunately, strike down. This is not good news for opponents of SAFE.

In a 7-to-2 decision, the high court said Monday the state provision violated the terms of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), which demands only a written declaration by the would-be registrant that he or she is a US citizen. "We hold that [the NVRA] precludes Arizona from requiring...

Supreme Court: Arizona citizenship proof law illegal | Fox News This is another reason why we cannot count on the courts.