UN Gun Control Treaty July 27.

[Holdover]

Fox news Gun treaty::

July 4 2012

U.N. Arms Trade Treaty = Global Gun Control - YouTube

July 5 2012

Megyn Kelly - Could UN arms treaty infringe on US Constitution - YouTube


July 4 2012 Canadian news.

U.N. Arms Trade Treaty = Global Gun Control - YouTube

July 4 2012 Canadian news.

Defence lawyer Solomon Friedman on the UN Arms Trade Treaty - YouTube

July 4 2012 Big Dick morris:

US Will Sign Gun Control Treaty on July 27!*Dick Morris TV Lunch ALERT! - YouTube

I would hope you spread these videos to your other gun websites .

[Holdover]

I dont know if this blockhead will or can actually sign this treaty. But if he does it is a direct assault upon the constitution of the US and the people of the United States.

Spread the videos.

[Dieter122]

Holdover...

From what ive heard on Fox from their legal experts, treaties override the Constitution....and they are INCREDIBLY difficult to get rid of once they are enacted/adopted.

[Sponty]

Holdover...

From what ive heard on Fox from their legal experts, treaties override the Constitution....and they are INCREDIBLY difficult to get rid of once they are enacted/adopted.

Yeah well a well armed populous will override their treaty.

[Dieter122]

Yeah well a well armed populous will override their treaty.

people today dont care as they once did.

Long as they have their ipods, ipads, starbucks, and walmarts...they are happy drones.

if people cared as they once did, we would of been shooting long long ago when our rights were slowly being taken away.

[Holdover]

Finding a loophole in the law may make it legal ,but doesnt make it right.

Remember everything Adolph Hitler did was legal too. and if we combine this treaty with the newer homeland security defintion , most of us arnt getting anymore guns,

The question also then arises to whom do we owe allegience? the constitution or the government??

[Holdover]

If you disarm the populace , there can be no defence against oppression.

"Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends [i.e., securing inherent and inalienable rights, with powers derived from the consent of the governed], it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness." --Thomas Jefferson: Declaration of Independence

This was the purpose of of the 2nd amendment

[Holdover]

[QUOTE=Dieter122;239420]people today dont care as they once did.

Long as they have their ipods, ipads, starbucks, and walmarts...they are happy drones.

QUOTE]

Got that right.

[plater1]

the UN has been trying to do this for years. it will NOT happen. any treaty has to be ratified by congress before it becomes law here. if you look back this same treaty gets airtime only during election years. don't be played by the media, make then stick to important issues.

[SRV1]

Fox news Gun treaty::

July 4 2012

U.N. Arms Trade Treaty = Global Gun Control - YouTube

July 5 2012

Megyn Kelly - Could UN arms treaty infringe on US Constitution - YouTube


July 4 2012 Canadian news.

U.N. Arms Trade Treaty = Global Gun Control - YouTube

July 4 2012 Canadian news.

Defence lawyer Solomon Friedman on the UN Arms Trade Treaty - YouTube

July 4 2012 Big Dick morris:

US Will Sign Gun Control Treaty on July 27!*Dick Morris TV Lunch ALERT! - YouTube

I would hope you spread these videos to your other gun websites .

Sorry, but I really do not trust what Fox news says. It is a far right group so as far the treaty goes, it will never pass in the senate. This is just another scare tactic from the right.

James

[Holdover]

I could be wrong. I just hope you guys are right. Could just be politics.

The proposal is definately real. the Canadians are reporting it also . Wether its signed or not or ratified is another matter. Im going to keep an eye on it though.

[timmyp]

Is this the same thing?
U.N. Agreement Should Have All Gun Owners Up In Arms - Forbes

[defilade]

Holdover...

From what ive heard on Fox from their legal experts, treaties override the Constitution....and they are INCREDIBLY difficult to get rid of once they are enacted/adopted.

Sorry, but the Constitution is the supreme law of the land!

[ChrisWNY]

people today dont care as they once did.

Long as they have their ipods, ipads, starbucks, and walmarts...they are happy drones.

if people cared as they once did, we would of been shooting long long ago when our rights were slowly being taken away.

If it's any consolation, I am no more willing to give up any of my firearms as I would to give up my iPad or my laptop. The gov't would have to pry either from my cold, dead hands before I'd give them up.

Have to agree with James that we're really dealing with a politically-motivated scare tactic (I'm sure gun vendors are liking it too, as sales have been through the roof lately). Swallowing the news hook, line, and sinker from a right-wing media source is no better than swallowing the trash spewed from the left-wing/liberal media. I've been spammed several times (Rand Paul, the NRA, etc.) regarding this UN Treaty, so that just further proves the BS political motivation behind it...

[BUCKrub91]

Holdover...

From what ive heard on Fox from their legal experts, treaties override the Constitution....and they are INCREDIBLY difficult to get rid of once they are enacted/adopted.

Nothing over rides the Constitution of the United States... I could care less what the Media says... The Constitution says I have the right to bear arms... that's exactly what I intend to do

[Suby]

Yeah well a well armed populous will override their treaty.

Doubtful, a few may go out with guns blazing but most people are honest non violent and will do what they are told. I hope it never comes to it.

[jmac00]

NObama can sign this treaty, but the Senate has to ratify it. IF the Senate ratifies this treaty, the TREATY does become Law-of-the-land

There is a section of the law that says <paraphrased> that treaties do in fact over ride the constitution and become law of the land.

Treaties are virtually impossible to get rid of once they are ratified.

We as Americans should be very concerned about this treaty as it gives ruling authority to a political body NOT PART OF America.

Regardless of what this treaty is about, Americans should be concerned that our present administration is willing to let an outside body have any say in what happens within our boarders. This gives an useless political body (The U.N.) a political foot in the door of America. And gives douche bags like George Soros one more point for his Social Engineers experiment.


Remember, you can't have UNETHICAL without the U.N.

[gizmo]

Nothing over rides the Constitution of the United States... I could care less what the Media says... The Constitution says I have the right to bear arms... that's exactly what I intend to do

I'm a simple man. If you violate our Constitution you are committing treason, and it doesn’t matter if you are a terrorist or the acting President.

[Wacky Worm]

UNethical indeed! Iran is on the committee overseeing the conference to finalize this treaty?!!

NObama can sign this treaty, but the Senate has to ratify it. IF the Senate ratifies this treaty, the TREATY does become Law-of-the-land

There is a section of the law that says <paraphrased> that treaties do in fact over ride the constitution and become law of the land.

Treaties are virtually impossible to get rid of once they are ratified.

We as Americans should be very concerned about this treaty as it gives ruling authority to a political body NOT PART OF America.

Regardless of what this treaty is about, Americans should be concerned that our present administration is willing to let an outside body have any say in what happens within our boarders. This gives an useless political body (The U.N.) a political foot in the door of America. And gives douche bags like George Soros one more point for his Social Engineers experiment.


Remember, you can't have UNETHICAL without the U.N.

[Jeff]

Holdover...

From what ive heard on Fox from their legal experts, treaties override the Constitution....and they are INCREDIBLY difficult to get rid of once they are enacted/adopted.

Reid v. Covert - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the Constitution supersedes international treaties ratified by the United States Senate. According to the decision, "this Court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over a treaty," although the case itself was with regard to an executive agreement, not a "treaty" in the U.S. legal sense, and the agreement itself has never been ruled unconstitutional.

Fox news it typical fear mongering conservative media. No different then CNN or MSNBC, they just lean the other way.

[twisted]

Just keep in mind how our Supreme Court seems to lean these days though. You can't take anything for granted now.

[JohnnyFamous]

How do we, as the people, gain control back?.... Voting seems to do nothing.

[guygus3516]

Doubtful, a few may go out with guns blazing but most people are honest non violent and will do what they are told. I hope it never comes to it.

Pussies!

[Suby]

You don't have to look back far, say around 1994 the people did nothing and the assault weapon ban came into effect which we are still under today. It will start there again and maybe go further or not take into account "prebans". It is not likely that we will adopt UN rules but then again I thought the same about Obama care as well.

PS I almost forgot....who was on that boating trip with me when the boat sank taking along all of our firearms and ammunition... tragically I might add.

[timmyp]

Fox news it typical fear mongering conservative media. No different then CNN or MSNBC, they just lean the other way.

Yeah right! FAIR AND BALANCED!!