Anyone know how the Heller vs. DC appeal arguments went today?

[Jeff]

I can't find any news reports or anything online.

[Sprout47]

Is this it?

http://www.lawandfreedom.com/site/fi...rII_Amicus.pdf

It has the right case number.

[Dion]

An order handed down yesterday, in Heller v. D.C. (D.C. Cir.):

BEFORE: Ginsburg, Henderson, and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

It is, on the court’s own motion, ORDERED that the parties file supplemental briefs addressing the following questions:

(1) After the Home Rule Act, Pub. L. No. 93–198, 87 Stat. 774 (1973) (codified at D.C. Code §§ 1–201.01–1–207.71 (2001)), do gun laws passed by the District of Columbia Council have to be “usual and reasonable” within the meaning of the federal Act of June 30, 1906, Pub. L. No. 59–401, which is currently codified at D.C. Code § 1–303.43? Cf. McIntosh v. Washington, 395 A.2d 744, 749–54 (D.C. 1978); Firemen’s Ins. Co. of Washington, D.C. v. Washington, 483 F.2d 1323, 1327–28 (D.C. Cir. 1973); Maryland & D.C. Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Washington, 442 F.2d 123, 125–29 & 125 n.9 (D.C. Cir. 1971); Fulton v. District of Columbia, 2 App. D.C. 431, 438–39 (D.C. Cir. 1894).

(2) What does the term “usual” mean in this statute? Cf. Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005); Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002); Firemen’s Ins. Co., 483 F.2d at 1327–28; Glover v. District of Columbia, 250 A.2d 556 (D.C. 1969); Filippo v. Real Estate Comm’n of the District of Columbia, 223 A.2d 268 (D.C. 1966); Black’s Law Dictionary (2d ed. 1910) (defining usual to mean “ordinary” or “customary”). Is the canon of constitutional avoidance relevant to that question? Cf. Fulton, 2 App. D.C. at 438–39.

(3) Are the challenged D.C. laws “usual” within the meaning of this statute?

(4) Does the D.C. Court of Appeals’ interpretation of the congressionally enacted Act of June 30, 1906, or of similarly worded federal statutes, receive deference from the federal courts? Cf. Bliley v. Kelly, 23 F.3d 507, 511 (D.C. Cir. 1994). If so, under what circumstances?

The following briefing format and schedule will apply:

Supplemental Brief for Appellants 12/01/10 (not to exceed 20 pages)

Supplemental Brief for Appellees 12/08/10 (not to exceed 20 pages)

Reply Brief for Appellants 12/13/10 (not to exceed 10 pages)

The United States is invited to file a brief, not to exceed 20 pages, on any or all of these questions by Friday, December 3, 2010....

[Jeff]

Thanks Dion. Thats the info I was looking for. Hope it turns out well when it all works itself out.